Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bryan Sean McKown's avatar

The amendment 14 Section 3 cases are simply elgibility cases. Trump has not been "thrown off" anything. Wreck is simply not eligible just like Arnold Schwarzenegger because Arnold is not a "natural born" citizen.

Obama is not eginleb either because he has already been President twice. My favorite Congressman is not eligible neither because he is not even 30 years old. Too young. A candidate must be 35.

In Colorado anyone can bring an eligibility case. In Maine it must be the Secretary of State. In BOTH states the lack of elgibility is stayed subject to further judicial review.

There have been about 8 such DQ's since the Civil War. There are some 16 other state cases pending EACH with its specific state procedures.

If SCOTUS is gutless there are at least a half dozen ways SCOTUS can avoid a definitive ruling on the merits.

Hope not on such easy cases.

Expand full comment
Bob Palmer's avatar

Reading Dr. Lee's essay today brought to mind the Roman concept of "virtu", which means, simply, 'doing the right thing, even when no one else is looking'. Virtu is the moral opposite of 'getting power and wealth, as much as you can, any way you can'. Which concept do you think best describes the moral standard of our current Congresspersons our Supreme Court Justices?

Cicero lived and died in a corrupt Roman leadership era that very much resembles our own. He argued for virtu on the floor of the Senate and was executed for it at the behest of Marc Anthony. His head and hands were nailed to the door as a warning to those who would speak truth to power.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts