Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Raul Zighelboim's avatar

What is Hamas?

1- the government and army of the people of Gaza who chose to bring war into the streets of cities and towns with no care whatsoever for the population they represent. A government that started a war they knew they could not win and that would bring death and misery to the people they represented.

Or

2- a terrorist organization keeping two million Palestinians as hostages. Hostages that have been abandoned by the international community and that no one dares rescue.

Or

3-???

What is reactive abuse?

What is DARVO?

Can you look at the horrors the population of Gaza is living from a domestic abuse perspective? As a parallel process.

Expand full comment
Richard Hahn's avatar

The ideal solution is in a U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, appropriately interpreted and administered. "Appropriately" is in prioritizing secular law, with equal justice based on independent objective evidence (which also pertains to science). It also includes recognition of belief systems from ancient times--religious faith- or opinion-based types. As such, it is simply realistic about how many humans continue to take comfort in explaining things, even in this scientific age. This ideal solution would not only be best for the Middle East but everywhere. The reality, of course, is how Israel maintains a right to exist basically because of a belief in a god that gave land to the Jewish people. After just about forever from having been persecuted, they now have a geographical area not only God-given but for a way of protecting themselves. The Muslim peoples/countries have their own priority of religious belief and their authorities to maintain it within their territories. Tragically, without universal justice in a common priority of secular law--regardless of geographical areas--there will be conflicts over demands for territory purportedly due to religious belief. The tragedy is furthered in how devout religious believers are abused by people who are power-hungry and use religion for control of territories. Thereby, the Israeli people and those like the author of this Personal Statement get horribly drawn into vicious cycles of conflicts that occur inside the box of prioritizing religious belief in governance. There is a sad irony in how the author found she could thrive in relative peace in countries that prioritize secular law. A humane step in the Middle East would involve everybody recognizing this kind of universal law, which would put Israel and Palestine on equal footing, to co-exist in relative peace with justice. Unfortunately, it would be such an immense step to take that it would be too big for the foreseeable future.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts